Archive for February, 2010

High Street allergy tests mislead public

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

The Sunday Times newspaper has again produced a masterpiece of investigative journalism (Sunday 21st February 2010) highlighting the frightening number of nonsense allergy and food intolerance tests available in central London. It is amazing that there is no public watchdog to prevent these unvalidated and unscientific allergy tests from being promoted to unsuspecting members of the public by inadequately trained practitioners and nutritionalists. Well done to Gillian Passmore and the Sunday Times for again drawing attention to the issue of misleading unorthodox allergy testing.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article7034867.ece

Lactose Intolerance only causes diarrhoea

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

Lactose Intolerance is a deficiency of the digestive enzyme B-galactosidase (Lactase) in the human intestine and a meal containing the cow‘s milk disaccharide sugar lactose (galactose bound to glucose) will induce frothy diarrhoea, flatulence and abdominal cramps.  This is caused by undigested lactose passing into the colon where it is hydrolysed by bowel bacteria producing organic acids and gas including CO2, H2 and H2O.  Symptoms do not include vomiting, rashes or nasal congestion as there is no immune response, it is purely undigested lactose that results in runny poop!

So if you do indeed have Lactose Intolerance, a proper cow’s milk challenge must theoretically give you rapid onset diarrhoea. No diarrhoea equates to no Lactose Intolerance. If your nose blocks up or they get a rash on your tummy then you probably have some additional problem other than purely lactose intolerance.

Almost all people are born with sufficient lactase but with increasing age, levels drop. Most lactose intolerant individuals tolerate small amounts of lactose in the diet and usually a full glass of fresh milk is necessary to trigger symptoms. Temporary lactose intolerance may follow a bout of viral gastroenteritis due to inflammation and hence it is best to avoid cow’s milk during the recovery period.

Lactose Intolerance may be an inherited trait affecting 10% of Caucasians and up to 80% of ethnic Africans, Asians and people of Mediterranean origin. Treatment is basically lactose avoidance or supplementation with an oral Lactase enzyme preparation such as Colief. Yoghurt is often tolerated as it contains live B-galactosidase producing bacteria.

Useful tests for diagnosing Lactose Intolerance include the popular Hydrogen Breath Test (although less reliable due to false positive results from other dietary sugar intake), as well as measuring serial blood glucose levels after a lactose containing meal, or measuring Faecal Reducing Substances (Sugars) in the watery frothy diarrhoeal stool  produced as a consequence of a lactose containing meal.

References:

Joneja JMV. Food Allergy & Intolerances. Mechanisms and Management. J.A.Hall publications 2003.

Metcalfe D, Sampson H, Simon R. Food Allergy: adverse reactions to food and food additives 4th Ed. Blackwell Science 2008

Skin infection causes eczema

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

The Staphylococcus Aureus (Staph) skin germ plays a pivotal role in aggravating moderate to severe atopic eczema especially in children.  Eczema first occurs in infancy but may persist through childhood into adulthood. Many factors have been implicated in causing and promoting eczema such as our gene makeup (atopy), skin allergy (to dust mites, pet dander and food allergens) and skin damage. The common skin Staph bacterium carried on our skin plays an important role in triggering eczema exacerbations.  While 10 and 40% of the general population naturally carry Staph on their skin, a whopping 90% of eczema sufferers have this germ inhabiting their skin. Studies reveal that 30% of moderate eczema sufferers are actually allergic to a toxin produced by the Staph, while in severe or difficult to control eczema, up to 68% of sufferers will have an allergy to it. The Staph also seems to make established eczema more difficult to treat by increasing skin resistance to therapeutic steroid creams – they just don’t seem to work as well if there is a Staph infection present.

Studies show that systematically eradicating the Staph from the skin will make the eczema easier to control and ultimately clear. In an established infection, the eczema will spread rapidly appearing bright red, crusty, weepy and blistered. The Staph can also persist by being harboured in the nasal passages, under dirty finger nails and in moist skin creases. Fortunately most Staph will be eliminated by antibiotic skin creams such as Mupirocin (Naseptin) or Fusidic acid (Fucidin) as well as by antiseptic skin disinfectants such as povidine iodine (Betadine), hydrogen peroxide, potassium permanganate and chlorhexidine (Hibitane). The beneficial effect of using sodium hypochlorite (found in bleech) and silver impregnated garments has not been proven.  In more extensive Staph infections presenting with Impetigo (skin honey crusts), Folliculitis (pimples and pustules) and Cellulitis (widespread skin surface infection), oral antibiotics such as Flucloxacillin, Erythromycin and Co-amoxyclav will effectively treat the skin infection (unless the superbug MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) is present).

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/120/Supplement_3/S122